Source Article By Ethan Huff Here
STUDY: 82% of pregnant women who got vaccinated for COVID during first and second trimesters suffered miscarriage
(Natural News) New research published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) inadvertently revealed that as many as 82 percent of pregnant women who get “vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) end up suffering a miscarriage.
Entitled, “Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons,” the paper contends with its words that there are “no obvious safety signals among pregnant [women] who received Covid-19 vaccines.” However, a table published as part of the study shows that the vast majority of pregnant women who get injected never end up delivering a live baby.
The study specifically looked at the mRNA (messenger RNA) jabs from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, which are the two most widely administered Chinese Virus injections in the country.
Deceptively, the research makes a more prominent claim that only 13.9 percent of all “completed pregnancies” end in miscarriage, even though this data point includes women who were not vaccinated until they reached the second half of their pregnancies.
The way the paper is presented makes it seem like there are no problems with the injections. It takes a careful eye to look more closely at the data, which is what one British oncology researcher did to come to a much different conclusion.
“The researchers inexplicably subsumed the first trimester spontaneous abortions – before, and including, 20 weeks – into the completed pregnancy / losses as a whole – 104 [miscarriages] out of 827 pregnancies,” she reportedly wrote to two prominent British doctors.
“However, since the aim was to discover whether Covid vaccination had any adverse effects in the different trimesters, the NEJM papers’ authors should have deducted the 700 women who were not actually vaccinated until the third trimester from the total 827, leaving only those vaccinated in the first 20 weeks, i.e. 127 women to figure in that part of Table 4.”
Medical establishment lying about miscarriages, spontaneous abortions caused by Chinese Virus injections
As such, the “real rate” of spontaneous miscarriages among women who were vaccinated within the first 20 weeks of their pregnancy is not 12.6 percent, but rather 82 percent because 104 out of 127 pregnancies were lost post-injection.
Though it was admitted in very fine print in the study, a total of 700 study participants, or 84.6 percent, received their first eligible dose of a Wuhan Flu shot during the third trimester. So, a total of 96 out of 104 spontaneous abortions, or 92.3 percent, occurred before 13 weeks of gestation.
“So the evidence is actually there in the NEJM study, but completely misrepresented in the way the data was presented in general,” the British oncologist warns.
Before Fauci Flu shots became a thing, the rate of first trimester miscarriages was between 10 and 26 percent. To have that rate jump to 82 percent post-injection for the Wuhan Flu represents “a more than three-fold incidence of spontaneous abortions directly linked to the mRNA vaccines,” the oncologist further wrote.
“So, yes, there is a huge red flag [against] vaccinating pregnant women here.”
Another person who contacted Life Site News confirmed this, indicating that her perception of the data contained in the study is that it does not match the associated claim that Wuhan Flu shots are safe and effective for pregnant women.
“It is clearly a lie and obvious to almost anyone,” this person reportedly wrote.
“Assuming that the remaining 127 women were before 20 weeks pregnant, that leaves an 82 percent miscarriage rate (104 out of 127). It is like saying that there were 700 men and 127 women studied and only a small percentage got pregnant. Well, from the start 700 could not have gotten pregnant in the first place,” she added.
More related news stories about the ongoing deception surrounding the safety and effectiveness of Chinese Virus injections (and lack thereof) can be found at ChemicalViolence.com.
Sources for this article include:
Archive.org
Archive.org
NaturalNews.com
================================================
COVID VACCINE CAUSING BREAST CANCER?
Note – women should not be getting yearly mammograms, period. Mammograms cause breast cancer due to radiation exposure.
=======================================
Women Vaccinated For COVID-19 May Show Symptoms Of Breast Cancer As Side-Effect
https://greatgameindia.com/covid-19-vaccine-breast-cancer/
New mammogram guidelines are announced by the Intermountain Healthcare doctors for women vaccinated for Covid-19 recently.
This may be in response to the side effect of the vaccine.
If you have recently got vaccinated, then there are the chances you may have to reschedule yearly mammograms.
Dr. Brett Parkinson (MD of Intermountain Healthcare’s Breast Care Centre) said, “When one receives a vaccination there is an inflammatory response in the arm,”.
Doctors have observed swollen lymph nodes on screening mammograms of women who recently got vaccinated for COVID-19.
“Whenever we see these on a normal screening mammogram we call those patients back because it can either mean metastatic breast cancer which travels to the lymph nodes or lymphoma or leukemia.”
[snip]
Read Full Article Here
================================================
Nursing Mothers Who Receive COVID Vaccine Report That Their Breast Milk is Drying Up
Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Source Article Here
Video commentator and producer ReallyGraceful, herself a new mother who is currently breastfeeding her baby, has just released a new video highlighting many reports from online of nursing mothers who are reporting that their breast milk is drying up after being injected with one of the experimental COVID shots.
This is from her new Rumble channel, but she is also on Bitchute.
YouTube is blocking many of her videos now, so be sure to subscribe to one of these other two channels to get her updates.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1twQRQLU7bpY/
================================================
34 Cases of Spontaneous Miscarriage and Stillbirth Reported After COVID Vaccine
For those who have not yet figured this out, the COVID vaccines are lethal injections. Thousands have died. Hundreds of thousands have become disabled. They are killing babies with this genetic bioweapon. Please avoid this “vaccine”.
By Lance D Johnson
(Natural News) In the rush to vaccinate every man, woman and child against a year-old coronavirus strain, sacrifices are being made. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is now reporting thirty-four cases of miscarriage and stillbirth associated with the experimental COVID-19 vaccinations. The initial guidelines warn pregnant women not to partake in these real-world vaccine trials, but the experiment is taking place regardless, as healthcare workers are pressured to take the shots, pregnant or not.
VAERS is a passive vaccine injury surveillance system run by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Many vaccine injuries are not recorded because healthcare officials do not want to be held accountable for administering something that did harm to a healthy patient. Because vaccine injury reporting is often discouraged, VAERS only captures less than one percent of all adverse events observed after vaccination. This means that there could already be 3,400 or more cases of miscarriage or stillbirth. A silent epidemic of infertility could be upon us.
Previously healthy healthcare workers suffer miscarriage, stillbirth after experimental vaccine
Most of the miscarriages occurred in the first trimester, when prenatal development is most tedious. Twenty-five of the miscarriages occurred within two weeks after the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was administered, with some miscarriage symptoms beginning within 48 hours after the shot was administered. Even more shocking, there were four stillborn babies after vaccination, all occurring in the second and third trimester.
One of the cases involves a 31-year-old physician from Tennessee. At five weeks pregnant, she suffered a miscarriage thirteen days after taking Pfizer’s mRNA shot. A 33-year-old nurse from Indiana suffered a miscarriage just five days after receiving a second dose of the Pfizer shot. She had no previous allergies to vaccines. A 32-year-old Virginia woman suffered a miscarriage just five days after receiving the Moderna shot. Prior to receiving the vaccine, she was checked over and cleared as healthy by two OBGYNs. The adverse event began just two days after the shot, starting with abdominal cramping, vaginal bleeding and then she suffered a miscarriage.
A 35-year-old Michigan woman monitored her baby’s movements after she was vaccinated with Pfizer’s experimental mRNA. She got the vaccine at 28 weeks and five days pregnant, and only two days later, she noticed her baby’s movements had slowed inside of her. Soon after, she gave birth at 29 weeks to a stillborn baby who weighed two pounds and seven ounces.
These serious issues have not stopped Pfizer from authorizing a new trial on 4,000 pregnant women who will be administered the experimental shots in the second and third trimester. After initially advising against vaccination of pregnant women, the World Health Organization is now giving doctors the green light to do so. The regulatory agencies concur that any pregnant woman is at greater risk of complications from a COVID-19 infection, as if their pregnancy is some kind of underlying condition, as if proper prenatal nutrition is not good enough. (Related: Why is the CDC withholding critical COVID-19 vaccine safety data from the public?)
Doctors warn that pregnant women are unnecessarily coerced, misled and used as guinea pigs
Dr. Shelley Cole, MD, OB-GYN is troubled that pregnant women are being lied to and coerced to take an experimental vaccine that involves deliberate risks to their body and their baby’s life. “It concerns me that the CDC says that there are no studies, but it’s okay to get it and you don’t even need to discuss it with your doctor,” Cole said in an interview with the Epoch Times. “I mean this is the opposite of everything that the scientific models and methods, and standard of care has been for a century.” Doctors have previously warned that new mRNA coronavirus vaccines will likely cause immune cells to attack placenta cells, causing female infertility, miscarriage or birth defects.
Dr. Cole has successfully treated over 550 patients with COVID-19 and understands that women don’t want to labor through an infection while they are pregnant. However, Dr. Cole knows from first-hand experience that COVID-19 doesn’t have to be a horrifying experience. She says pregnant women should be given the option to have hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and other immune enhancements, so they don’t suffer if an infection does arise. Dr. Cole recommends her patients take 1000 milligrams of whole food vitamin C twice a day and up to 5000 iu of vitamin D.
If medical authorities gave true informed consent, then pregnant women would be encouraged to adopt strategies that help them cope with all the immune and developmental challenges throughout their pregnancy. Minerals such as magnesium, calcium, selenium and chromium play a healthy role in pregnancy. Scaring women to take experimental vaccines is coercion. Giving them false assurance that the vaccines block all infections is misguided, especially when the mortality rate for a potential COVID-19 infection is practically nonexistent for women of this age group.
“So it is scary, it is scary, but the vast majority of women that are pregnant are under the age of 40, the death rate is extremely low,” said Dr. Cole. “And people do not have to go to the hospital if they’re treated early, or if they use early prevention.”
Learn more about the ill effects of Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines at VaccineDamage.news.
Sources include:
EpochTimes.com
DigitalAHRQ.gov[PDF]
EpochTimes.com
NaturalNews.com
NaturalNews.com
This article originally appeared on NATURAL NEWS.
================================================
COVID Vaccine Causing Miscarriage and Fetal Damage
Posted at National Vaccine Information Center
From the 2/12/2021 release of VAERS data:
Found 111 cases where Vaccine is COVID19 and Symptom is Aborted pregnancy or Abortion or Abortion spontaneous or Abortion spontaneous complete or Abortion spontaneous incomplete or Abortion threatened or Exposure during pregnancy or Foetal-maternal haemorrhage or Foetal cardiac disorder or Foetal damage or Foetal death or Foetal disorder or Foetal distress syndrome or Foetal heart rate abnormal or Foetal heart rate deceleration or Foetal heart rate deceleration abnormality or Foetal heart rate decreased or Foetal heart rate disorder or Foetal heart rate increased or Foetal hypokinesia or Foetal malformation or Foetal malpresentation or Foetal monitoring abnormal or Foetal movement disorder or Foetal movements decreased or Foetal non-stress test abnormal or Placental disorder or Pregnancy induced hypertension or Pregnancy test positive or Premature baby or Premature baby death or Premature delivery or Premature labour or Premature rupture of membranes or Premature separation of placenta or Stillbirth or Ultrasound foetal abnormal
See the data here
================================================
COVID Vaccine May Cause Sterility in Both Men and Women – Women’s Bodies May No Longer Be Able to Create a Placenta
This groundbreaking news needs to be shared far and wide. Those who control the media tried to block people from seeing this information by deleting not only the original article, but the entire blog on which the article had been posted. Nevertheless, the web crawler grabbed views of the article and I am including the text below. You can see the article in its entirety here.
Head of Pfizer Research: Covid Vaccine is Female Sterilization
The vaccine contains a spike protein (see image) called syncytin-1, vital for the formation of human placenta in women. If the vaccine works so that we form an immune response AGAINST the spike protein, we are also training the female body to attack syncytin-1, which could lead to infertility in women of an unspecified duration.
Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon request a stop of all corona vaccination studies and call for co-signing the petition
On December 1, 2020, the ex-Pfizer head of respiratory research Dr. Michael Yeadon and the lung specialist and former head of the public health department Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg filed an application with the EMA, the European Medicine Agency responsible for EU-wide drug approval, for the immediate suspension of all SARS CoV 2 vaccine studies, in particular the BioNtech/Pfizer study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42).
BREAKING: FDA announces 2 deaths of Pfizer vaccine trial participants from “serious adverse events”
Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon demand that the studies – for the protection of the life and health of the volunteers – should not be continued until a study design is available that is suitable to address the significant safety concerns expressed by an increasing number of renowned scientists against the vaccine and the study design.
On the one hand, the petitioners demand that, due to the known lack of accuracy of the PCR test in a serious study, a so-called Sanger sequencing must be used. This is the only way to make reliable statements on the effectiveness of a vaccine against Covid-19. On the basis of the many different PCR tests of highly varying quality, neither the risk of disease nor a possible vaccine benefit can be determined with the necessary certainty, which is why testing the vaccine on humans is unethical per se.
Furthermore, they demand that it must be excluded, e.g. by means of animal experiments, that risks already known from previous studies, which partly originate from the nature of the corona viruses, can be realized. The concerns are directed in particular to the following points:
-
The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus.
-
The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.
-
The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70{07852e6e605eab5487b14855361b49717f1863b3cb5f40601bc93fc2480bbef1} of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.
-
The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow. Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020.
CALL FOR HELP: Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon ask as many EU citizens as possible to co-sign their petition by sending the e-mail prepared here to the EMA.
Not part of the original article but a comment….
After a little research it turns out that Syncytin-1 is also present in sperm, so it’s not only Women that will be steralised but Men as well. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261257414_Syncytin-1_and_its_receptor_is_present_in_human_gametes
Questions you Ask all Governments
before getting the Covid Vaccine
From: http://tapnewswire.com/2020/12/a-quick-glance-at-the-small-print-spells-danger/
================================================
Pfizer COVID Vax Receivers Can Infect those Who are Not Vaccinated, Causing Miscarriage, Poisoned Breastmilk, and Babies with Cognitive Deficits
The following information was published by Jim Stone
PFIZER DOCUMENT STATES THAT BOTH SKIN CONTACT AND INHALATION WILL TRANSMIT WHATEVER IS IN THE COVID VAX FROM THE VACCINATED TO THE UNVACCINATED AND THAT THE RESULTS ARE DEVASTATING
See the Pfizer Document Here and Here
Here is what just a small portion of what this Pfizer document is saying:
1. If a man who was not vaccinated touches a vaccinated woman, or breathes any of the air she breathes, (in other words, walks by her in the office) and he then has sex with his wife, his wife can have an adverse event and she should avoid having children.
2. If a woman who was never vaccinated gets exposed to a woman who was vaccinated, she can:
-
miscarry
-
spontaneously abort,
-
poison a baby via her breast milk
-
Have babies that have cognitive difficulties.
This is universal, and very bad. Here is a small section of text I translated to English:
8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure
“An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial participant.
When such exposures happen, the investigator must report them to Pfizer saftey within 24 hours of becoming aware of when they happened, regardless of whether or not there is an associated secondary adverse event. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event report form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT PERTAIN TO A PARTICIPANT INVOLVED IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE STUDY.”
TO CLARIFY: Vaccine study participants become super spreaders of something, they don’t say what it is, but it triggers secondary adverse events in people that never had the vax, when they are exposed to people who did have the vax.
THIS IS SO BAD that right here, in this little bit of quoted text, it warns that un-vaccinated men who have been exposed to a woman who was vaxxed will then pass whatever is in the vax to another woman.
Even the relatively small portion of the document I have put below here says the vax triggers spontaneous abortions and reproductive problems when un-vaccinated people are exposed to the vaccinated and that breast milk from a vaccinated mom can harm the infant. And if anyone does not believe it, then click the link above and wade through that enormous and intentionally confusing document. It’s for real folks, the vax is indeed the kill shot.
Do not permit the vaccinated to come anywhere near you, it is now official.
Here is a small portion of this huge document, straight from Pfizer:
Terms:
Study intervention – A vaccine test subject.
AE – Adverse event in someone who got the vax.
SAE: An adverse event in someone who was exposed to someone who got the vax.
EDP: Exposure during pregnancy8.3.5. Exposure During Pregnancy or Breastfeeding, and Occupational Exposure Exposure to the study intervention under study during pregnancy or breastfeeding and occupational exposure are reportable to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness.
8.3.5.1. Exposure During Pregnancy An EDP occurs if:
* A female participant is found to be pregnant while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.
* A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
* A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy:
* A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.
* A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
If this vax is not shedding into other people, why would contact between vaccinated and un-vaccinated be an event worth noting? If this vax is not shedding, then WHY does a guy who has been around a vaccinated woman, even if he did not touch her or have sex, need to worry about getting a different woman pregnant?
That’s not all, the following is detailed, and far worse.
The investigator must report EDP to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred. The initial information submitted should include the anticipated date of delivery (see below for information related to termination of pregnancy)
If EDP occurs in a participant or a participant’s partner, the investigator must report this information to Pfizer Safety on the Vaccine SAE Report Form and an EDP Supplemental Form, regardless of whether an SAE has occurred. Details of the pregnancy will be collected after the start of study intervention and until 6 months after the last dose of study intervention.
If EDP occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the investigator must report information to Pfizer Safety using the Vaccine SAE Report Form and EDP Supplemental Form. Since the exposure information does not pertain to the participant enrolled in the study, the information is not recorded on a CRF; however, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file. Follow-up is conducted to obtain general information on the pregnancy and its outcome for all EDP reports with an unknown outcome. The investigator will follow the pregnancy until completion (or until pregnancy termination) and notify Pfizer Safety of the outcome as a follow-up to the initial EDP Supplemental Form. In the case of a live birth, the structural integrity of the neonate can be assessed at the time of birth. In the event of a termination, the reason(s) for termination should be specified and, if clinically possible, the structural integrity of the terminated fetus should be assessed by gross visual inspection (unless preprocedure test findings are conclusive for a congenital anomaly and the findings are reported). Abnormal pregnancy outcomes are considered SAEs. If the outcome of the pregnancy meets the criteria for an SAE (ie, ectopic pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, intrauterine fetal demise, neonatal death, or congenital anomaly), the investigator should follow the procedures for reporting SAEs.
Additional information about pregnancy outcomes that are reported to Pfizer Safety as SAEs follows:
Spontaneous abortion including miscarriage and missed abortion;
Neonatal deaths that occur within 1 month of birth should be reported, without regard to causality, as SAEs. In addition, infant deaths after 1 month should be reported as SAEs when the investigator assesses the infant death as related or possibly related to exposure to the study intervention. Additional information regarding the EDP may be requested by the sponsor. Further follow-up of birth outcomes will be handled on a case-by-case basis (eg, follow-up on preterm infants to identify developmental delays). In the case of paternal exposure, the investigator will provide the participant with the Pregnant Partner Release of Information Form to deliver to his partner. The investigator must document in the source documents that the participant was given the Pregnant Partner Release of Information Form to provide to his partner.
8.3.5.2. Exposure During Breastfeeding An exposure during breastfeeding occurs if:
A female participant is found to be breastfeeding while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.
A female is found to be breastfeeding while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention (ie, environmental exposure). An example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact. The investigator must report exposure during breastfeeding to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred. The information must be reported using the Vaccine SAE Report Form. When exposure during breastfeeding occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the exposure information does not pertain to the participant enrolled in the study, so the information is not recorded on a CRF. However, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file. An exposure during breastfeeding report is not created when a Pfizer drug specifically approved for use in breastfeeding women (eg, vitamins) is administered in accord with authorized use. However, if the infant experiences an SAE associated with such a drug, the SAE is reported together with the exposure during breastfeeding.
Here’s the clear part of this, that everyone can understand:
8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with the study intervention, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an AE. Such persons may include healthcare providers, family members, and other roles that are involved in the trial participant’s care. The investigator must report occupational exposure to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, regardless of whether there is an associated SAE. The information must be reported using the Vaccine SAE Report Form. Since the information does not pertain to a participant enrolled in the study, the information is not recorded on a CRF; however, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file.